Search for: "P. Schmidt" Results 1 - 20 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2009, 6:39 am by Paul
In response to Schmidt, Security researcher Bruce Schneier referenced an eloquent piece he wrote in 2006 that makes the case that "[p]rivacy is an inherent human right, and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and respect. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm by Rick Hasen
Keystone Politics: “I think the correct way to understand why Al Schmidt was willing to put his name on this hilariously unscientific ”study” on voting irregularities in Philly is that conservative politicians, pundits and blog trolls needed a passable comeback to the overwhelming evidence that voter fraud is a fake thing.” [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm by laborprof lpb
Dau-Schmidt & Todd Dvorak, Review of Labor and Employment Decisions from the United States Supreme Court's 2008-2009 Term, p.107. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 8:06 am
Germany: Marlene Schmidt, Employment, the Family, and the Law: Current Problems in Germany,... [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 3:20 pm by Megan Geuss
Last week, Schmidt’s attorneys made a last-minute bid requesting a lighter sentence for Schmidt: 40 months of supervised release and a $100,000 fine. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:09 am by Megan Geuss
In the aftermath of the scandal, Schmidt left VW and returned to Germany, but he was arrested in January while on vacation in Miami. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:36 am by Chris Castle
Richard Blumenthal to Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman, Google, p. 2). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Omer (Texas A&M University, Mays Business School) & Andrew P. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 6:11 am by Ned Foley
Michael Schmidt and Maggie Haberman report that “M. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm by Sam Machkovech
Enlarge / Eric Schmidt, former executive chairman of Alphabet Inc., in Paris in 2017. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 11:16 pm by Orly Lobel
Neal Kumar Katyal and Thomas Schmidt just published an article in the Harvard Law Review criticizing the Roberts Court for, among other things, using the constitutional avoidance canon to articulate new constitutional norms, a use of the canon that they call “generative avoidance” (p. 2112). [read post]